Anonymous

ScoutWiki:Community Portal: Difference between revisions

From ScoutWiki, For Everyone, Everywhere involved with Scouting and Guiding...
no edit summary
m (Advertising)
No edit summary
Line 19: Line 19:


We can't keep on giving those infinite blocks. Instead we need to figure out a decent duration after which the block expires – two weeks, month, two months — pretty much anything but infinite. Also, we need to think if we need to allow anonymous edits at all. It seems the only reasonable edits are done by logged-in users anyway, so I think it'd be a feasible option. --[[User:ZeiP|ZeiP]] 03:58, 17 November 2007 (EET)
We can't keep on giving those infinite blocks. Instead we need to figure out a decent duration after which the block expires – two weeks, month, two months — pretty much anything but infinite. Also, we need to think if we need to allow anonymous edits at all. It seems the only reasonable edits are done by logged-in users anyway, so I think it'd be a feasible option. --[[User:ZeiP|ZeiP]] 03:58, 17 November 2007 (EET)
I think that it would be good to block anonymous edits. I avoid giving infinite blocks, but all admins should do so. [[User:Juham|Juham]] 00:25, 3 December 2007 (EET)


== Advertising ==
== Advertising ==
Line 25: Line 27:


[[User:Ericblazek|Ericblazek]] 07:16, 30 November 2007 (EET)
[[User:Ericblazek|Ericblazek]] 07:16, 30 November 2007 (EET)
Someone should contact the British Scoutnet association, they know many potential contributors. [[User:Juham|Juham]] 00:25, 3 December 2007 (EET)
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.